ClickHouse says winning the database layer isn’t the same as winning observability, and discusses where it still falls short.
ClickHouse says claims that it is “winning the observability wars” sparked debate. In an article shared by The New Stack, it examines why it has become what it describes as a leading storage and query engine, where it falls short, and why database-layer success isn’t the same as winning observability.
968
1 post, first seen 5d ago
ClickHouse says winning the database layer isn’t the same as winning observability, and discusses where it still falls short.
ClickHouse says claims that it is “winning the observability wars” sparked debate. In an article shared by The New Stack, it examines why it has become what it describes as a leading storage and query engine, where it falls short, and why database-layer success isn’t the same as winning observability.
The New Stack@thenewstackSo, is ClickHouse winning the observability wars? via @ClickHouseDB, by @MikeShi42
The New Stack@thenewstackSo, is ClickHouse winning the observability wars? via @ClickHouseDB, by @MikeShi42