I'm very pro-scan. Make ultrasound scanning fast and cheap. It's totally possible to have false positives, but with the power of Bayes we can figure it out.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity
Of course I'm pro scanning! False positives are not a fundamental problem. Literal textbook example of Bayes' Theorem. Wtf is wrong with people

@JeffLadish The problem is that to actually correctly apply Bayes’ to the problem is difficult. You would need a posterior on future harm with no treatment, which itself depends on a bunch of terms that cannot be solved by more scanning alone.

@JeffLadish Not impossible to solve problems, by any means. But you’d basically need to run experiments to scan people and not treat things that by current standards of care we _would_ treat today

@JeffLadish But i think saying this is a simple application of Bayes’ elides a lot of difficulties with the determination of the probabilities you’d need to know to plug into the formula