Commentary on X
Which is surprising, yes, but involves no new ideas. Just because a problem is technically 50 years old, and was asked once by Erdos, does not automatically make it significant, or mean that the proof contains anything interesting (above what was already known).
3:19 PM · Jul 14, 2026It's strange what happens to go viral and what doesn't. E.g. I think the other recent GPT/@prz_chojecki proof claim to problem 421 is much more interesting, both in the problem statement and the ideas in the proof (though I haven't verified the latter for correctness yet).
3:23 PM · Jul 14, 2026@thomasfbloom the frequency of correct proofs is the most impressive part imo. Went from basically nothing to new news every week
5:23 PM · Jul 14, 2026Combined views
11
2 posts, first seen 20h ago
9 reposts