The proposal combines philosophy with technical reward training setups
Refreshing
What happens when AIs become smarter than us? Why would they keep humans around if given the choice?
Our new paper argues that only trying to control AIs is a limited strategy, and that a stable, mutualistic human-AI future may be possible.
Users back the new paper's push for mutualistic human-AI relations because it favors collaboration over anxiety about control switches in an agentic future.
One of the more interesting takes on positive alignment that have recently come out-it’s long and interesting, combining philosophy and training setups (eg reward proposals), and worth a read.
What happens when AIs become smarter than us? Why would they keep humans around if given the choice?
Our new paper argues that only trying to control AIs is a limited strategy, and that a stable, mutualistic human-AI future may be possible.
@_rockt The agentic future needs more mutualism and less 'off' switch anxiety. ⚡️
The proposal combines philosophy with technical reward training setups
Refreshing
What happens when AIs become smarter than us? Why would they keep humans around if given the choice?
Our new paper argues that only trying to control AIs is a limited strategy, and that a stable, mutualistic human-AI future may be possible.