Positive users endorse calls for tech wealth to fund Super PACs against Marxism as prudent advice, while negative users accuse the proposals of promoting election-buying and corruption.
Based on 23 visible X reactions from 137 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Completely correct observation, the interesting question is why the high-net-worth individuals have to be told to do this at all. Most outsiders assume tech money is already doing this, since it is a pretty obvious play. It is surprising that they're not.
for anyone in tech with money: the annual percentage they want to take from you each year via asset seizure is what you should be plowing into super pacs, NGOs, and media influencers right now to beat back marxism. the hour's late, and nobody else is coming to save you.
Worth pondering. Surprising but difficult to dispute.
He proposes donating annual wealth percentages to super PACs.
Completely correct observation, the interesting question is why the high-net-worth individuals have to be told to do this at all. Most outsiders assume tech money is already doing this, since it is a pretty obvious play. It is surprising that they're not.
for anyone in tech with money: the annual percentage they want to take from you each year via asset seizure is what you should be plowing into super pacs, NGOs, and media influencers right now to beat back marxism. the hour's late, and nobody else is coming to save you.
Worth pondering. Surprising but difficult to dispute.
@micsolana Which ones do you recommend supporting ?
Positive users endorse calls for tech wealth to fund Super PACs against Marxism as prudent advice, while negative users accuse the proposals of promoting election-buying and corruption.
Based on 23 visible X reactions from 137 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@micsolana Which ones do you recommend supporting ?