We should switch to human-verified AI reviews for the bottom 30% of NeurIPS submissions. No human has the patience to describe all ways in which these Hail Maries don't meet the bar 😢
6:18 AM · Jun 23, 2026 · 1.8K Views
Attention paper co-author Dzmitry Bahdanau proposes using human-verified AI reviews to evaluate the bottom 30% of NeurIPS submissions
He argues humans lack patience to document low-quality submissions.
113102.2K
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
Digg Deeper
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS419LIKES2
Delip Rao e/σ@deliprao
@DBahdanau what's a reasonable proposal to assess the bottom 30%?
🇺🇦 Dzmitry Bahdanau@DBahdanau
We should switch to human-verified AI reviews for the bottom 30% of NeurIPS submissions. No human has the patience to describe all ways in which these Hail Maries don't meet the bar 😢
3hViews 419Likes 2Bookmarks 0