Positive users praise distillation from model outputs as the most efficient way to boost performance, while negative users criticize loose terminology and overrating of output imitation.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@RyanGreenblatt @stanislavfort Yeah in every of my test distillation is the single most efficient way to lift a model ceiling and unlock faster rl learning. Dont know what op’is saying
@stanislavfort It is stupid that people confuse Hinton distillation for output apeing (2) and overrate (2) so much. But don't reverse their stupidity
@RyanGreenblatt @stanislavfort That’s SFT warmup for RL tho not really distillation, unless you are just bastardizing the hell out of its definition
@RyanGreenblatt @stanislavfort +1 there's a lot of public literature showing this
@stanislavfort distinguish: 1) teacher logits 2) SFT on teacher text 3) teacher which filters a synthetic data stream 4) teacher which does rejection sampling on student text 5) teacher which scores RL rollouts midway I have no privileged info but obviously 3-5 can explain a great deal
@stanislavfort "Output apeing" is my silly name for 2, SFTing from a stronger teacher. Your initial tweet is right that (2) is overrated. But it's the opposite mistake to say "those people are silly" and thereby miss these other techniques that fit under a squinting umbrella of "distinction"
@stanislavfort > Distilling without logits is crazy inefficient This is very false for obtaining perf improvements from post training / RL. E.g., many experiments indicated you could train DeepSeek v3 to match r1 on (narrow) math with just 1000s of transcripts from r1.
@stanislavfort also SFT is not inefficient and it may be SOTA for midtraining warmup. R1 only used like 100k pairs iirc
Positive users praise distillation from model outputs as the most efficient way to boost performance, while negative users criticize loose terminology and overrating of output imitation.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@gleech I don't understand what you mean by this. Could you spell it out?