Negative users warn against using Fable for judgment tasks because its superhuman intent-surfacing is misleading and it slathers praise over minor elements.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@gleech @TheStalwart I would be a bit weary of using Fable for this stuff. It's ability to surface intent and references is superhuman, so you'll fool yourself into thinking your work is clearer than it is. Plus the usual agreeableness issues.
@gleech @TheStalwart the poem one is a good example but > But that's the rub the sequence turns on: at that density, Chinese is not telegraphese I zone out when I see this style of phrasing, it's so tiresome to read through
@gleech @TheStalwart Oh, and they will slather praise over any eyeball kicks in your work. Which is a valid preference, albeit an idiosyncratic one. https://x.com/girllich1/status/2074939221970981059
@gleech @TheStalwart I would be a bit weary of using Fable for this stuff. It's ability to surface intent and references is superhuman, so you'll fool yourself into thinking your work is clearer than it is. Plus the usual agreeableness issues.
@gleech @TheStalwart the poem one is a good example but > But that's the rub the sequence turns on: at that density, Chinese is not telegraphese I zone out when I see this style of phrasing, it's so tiresome to read through
@gleech @TheStalwart Oh, and they will slather praise over any eyeball kicks in your work. Which is a valid preference, albeit an idiosyncratic one. https://x.com/girllich1/status/2074939221970981059
Negative users warn against using Fable for judgment tasks because its superhuman intent-surfacing is misleading and it slathers praise over minor elements.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.