Many users supported the criticism of Dario Amodei and AI safety advocates as untrustworthy authoritarians threatening open access while others called the claims misleading doomerism or dangerously polarizing.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 57 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@perrymetzger The feelings these people exude and those they evoque (in me, for example) are dangerous. Eerily close to political polarization that precedes genocide, which would be curious and funny if they weren’t talking already in terms of “please don’t kill us”. Pathetic and dangerous.
@perrymetzger turns out a ruthless capitalist is actually more trustworthy than a self appointed moral expert
@chuckmckinnon @perrymetzger https://x.com/i/status/2076839071112950081
@beffjezos keep pushing
They argue global safety rules threaten future open-source model releases.
@perrymetzger The feelings these people exude and those they evoque (in me, for example) are dangerous. Eerily close to political polarization that precedes genocide, which would be curious and funny if they weren’t talking already in terms of “please don’t kill us”. Pathetic and dangerous.
@perrymetzger turns out a ruthless capitalist is actually more trustworthy than a self appointed moral expert
Many users supported the criticism of Dario Amodei and AI safety advocates as untrustworthy authoritarians threatening open access while others called the claims misleading doomerism or dangerously polarizing.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 57 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@beffjezos lol who listens to them