Negative users dismissed claims that OpenAI GPT-5.6 undercuts DeepSeek V4 on price via Blackwell efficiency as bullshit, accusing the company of lacking transparency around IPO subsidies.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@ryiacy no. dumb peasant take OpenAI has great talent and isn't really blocked from doing similar model optimizations being on the frontier and having lots of GPU rewards model optimizations just the same
@teortaxesTex There's a reason they are not being transparent about API pricing and subscription subsidies. Why wouldn't you share positive news before the IPO?
Was bound to happen at some point There is literally no structural reason for Chinese models to ever be cheaper https://twitter.com/sun_hanchi/status/2076497122518810674
@teortaxesTex maybe power cost, eventually...
@ryiacy no. dumb peasant take OpenAI has great talent and isn't really blocked from doing similar model optimizations being on the frontier and having lots of GPU rewards model optimizations just the same
@teortaxesTex There's a reason they are not being transparent about API pricing and subscription subsidies. Why wouldn't you share positive news before the IPO?
Was bound to happen at some point There is literally no structural reason for Chinese models to ever be cheaper https://twitter.com/sun_hanchi/status/2076497122518810674
@teortaxesTex maybe power cost, eventually...
Negative users dismissed claims that OpenAI GPT-5.6 undercuts DeepSeek V4 on price via Blackwell efficiency as bullshit, accusing the company of lacking transparency around IPO subsidies.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.