Many users endorse minimal data storage as a security strategy by sharing practices like logging to /dev/null or using fake data, while others mock the approach with extreme analogies and doubt its appeal to executives.
Based on 9 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@yacineMTB I store fake data for everyone just in case we are hacked. No reason to store real data. People aren’t that interesting. Joe bob from Hoboken has lots of hobbies and an up and down credit score. I don’t even store real passwords, I just assume whatever they enter is correct.
@yacineMTB yeah @yacineMTB I try to keep all my important facts in my own head. You're rubbish at that so you have "Claudia" or whatever doing thinking for you, even though @claudeai isn't actually intelligent. Most likely.
@NoemiTitarenco @yacineMTB "dull surprise" is what I would expect from a corporate executive, @NoemiTitarenco and @yacineMTB. The profession of corporate leadership does not attract great minds.
@yacineMTB Of course. And if you have no code, then you'll have no vulnerabilities
@yacineMTB only the paranoid survive, but knowing your risk profile makes survival easier
@yacineMTB This is why most of my logs in production go to /dev/null
by the way; the best threat model is no threat model. if you don't store any data that you can't lose then you have nothing to be worried about (in general)
Basically... These guys don't really care if they get hacked because there is nothing to hack
Many users endorse minimal data storage as a security strategy by sharing practices like logging to /dev/null or using fake data, while others mock the approach with extreme analogies and doubt its appeal to executives.
Based on 9 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.