Pangram AI detector flags Hunter Biden's political strategy post as 100% machine-generated

@DKThomp It's a shame because the bits that aren't AI-generated are where he really adds value

@Birdyword Hunter,

Don’t fear human writing. Court it.

- D

@DKThomp He corrected Democrats correctly, so Derek has to correct his rhetoric... which was also correct. 😎

@AlecStapp “X now reads like Y” is one of the many things that you flag immediately if you know AI writing well.

@AlanMCole It’s crazy to me that most people (at least in the replies and quote-tweets) still can’t spot it

@AlecStapp Pangram adoption must grow faster:

@DKThomp It’s funny that AI basically has the baseline writing style of Yoda by way of Sorenson.

@AdamMantine @sgodofsk Pangram is much better than other detectors and has an extremely low false positive rate.

@MaxXWilliamson @DKThomp Most people genuinely can't tell the difference between human and AI writing. And that's rare.

@siddharth3 @AlecStapp Yes, it's bad to use "various websites" for AI detection just like getting any other truth from "various websites" without regards to whether they are accurate. Use a bunch of garbage detectors, you get what you deserve.

@AlecStapp Perhaps it is. But it isn’t always clear cut.

@DKThomp You seething you fucking moron

@DKThomp Boy, Sorensen was the best.

@DKThomp The AI slop is everywhere now, from X to LinkedIn. It’s so easy to tell too and honestly so laughable. Nobody talks or writes like that, it’s so fake

@DKThomp Good analysis of AI structures.

@AlecStapp 🤣🤣😭😭

@DKThomp "Authenticity is measurable"

@DKThomp @daveweigel How's the whole abundance thing going?

@DKThomp At best abundantly clueless says what?

@DKThomp I had no idea.