They propose reframing AI governance around its societal impacts.
The AI community seems to increasingly be heading towards a polarized world when discussing safety and consolidated power. I see this discourse as a false dichotomy, so @profjoeyg and I wrote an essay on how we need to change the conversation (link below).
Positive users welcome essays framing AI safety versus power consolidation as a false dichotomy for spurring broader discourse on AI's future, while negative users dismiss the discussion as a waste of time that ignores employment losses.
A good essay by @pgasawa and @profjoeyg on a more nuanced view of AI advances.
The AI community seems to increasingly be heading towards a polarized world when discussing safety and consolidated power. I see this discourse as a false dichotomy, so @profjoeyg and I wrote an essay on how we need to change the conversation (link below).
We need more rising star researchers like Parth talking about how the technology we are building will impact society. I also happen to agree with him.
The AI community seems to increasingly be heading towards a polarized world when discussing safety and consolidated power. I see this discourse as a false dichotomy, so @profjoeyg and I wrote an essay on how we need to change the conversation (link below).
Link: https://pgasawa.bearblog.dev/unsafe-ai-or-consolidated-power-ais-false-dichotomy/
More smart people should be engaged in the larger picture discourse about the future of AI — reach out if you have thoughts.
@JeffDean @pgasawa @profjoeyg the third option is always a paper until someone writes the CLAUDE.md for it.
@JeffDean @pgasawa @profjoeyg This is waste of cycles, how is Google planning to offset the employment loses by funding training? I’m not interested in hyperbolic bullshit
@JeffDean @pgasawa @profjoeyg May I seek your assistance? @Jjfufjcuc3 @ShtKi2g4qV2EreD 🌸 🚩
