• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
Technology

a16z’s Anish Acharya says startup ideas can be too small to back

The a16z general partner says the firm’s approach now has “no ceiling on ambition.” He sees ways to put a $100 million seed round to productive use—but explicitly isn’t recommending founders raise that much.

A1
2 Sources, 23d ago, first seen 23d ago

TLDR

In remarks shared by a16z on September 11, 2026, general partner Anish Acharya described a shift in how the firm picks companies. It once avoided ideas that seemed too ambitious or complex; now, he says, it is “almost seeing the opposite problem,” with ideas too small to interest the firm. Even a $100 million seed round is something he says founders could discuss using productively, though he stresses that he isn’t recommending one. He frames the firm’s goal as helping founders build “the strongest form of your vision.”

Combined views

71K

2 Sources, first seen 23d ago

220 likes45 comments102 saves19 reposts

Combined views

71K

2 Sources, first seen 23d ago

220 likes45 comments102 saves19 reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

@a16za16z GP Anish Acharya says three years ago, ideas were too ambitious. Today, they're too small. "In the old days, which is three years ago, we would see a company, and if what they were trying to do was too ambitious, we would not engage. Just too crazy, too complex." "Implied by that is you wouldn't do a $100 million seed because it's too much money for almost any problem. It's too much money for any person to actually manage... It doesn't make sense as an inception round." "Today we're almost seeing the opposite problem, where an idea that's too small is not something that we want to engage with." "You can talk about how you put $100 million to work in a seed productively. I'm not recommending you raise $100 million, but this sort of no ceiling on ambition is showing up in how we're picking companies." "When we invest, we tell every founder, 'We're here to help you build the strongest form of your vision.' Marc told me... the way we told our story when we were raising our first fund was, 'We were going to the moon, or we were going to leave a moon-sized crater in the ground, and there was no other option.' That's how we want to work with our founders as well." @illscience w/ @lennysan23d
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    2 Sources

    @a16za16z GP Anish Acharya says three years ago, ideas were too ambitious. Today, they're too small. "In the old days, which is three years ago, we would see a company, and if what they were trying to do was too ambitious, we would not engage. Just too crazy, too complex." "Implied by that is you wouldn't do a $100 million seed because it's too much money for almost any problem. It's too much money for any person to actually manage... It doesn't make sense as an inception round." "Today we're almost seeing the opposite problem, where an idea that's too small is not something that we want to engage with." "You can talk about how you put $100 million to work in a seed productively. I'm not recommending you raise $100 million, but this sort of no ceiling on ambition is showing up in how we're picking companies." "When we invest, we tell every founder, 'We're here to help you build the strongest form of your vision.' Marc told me... the way we told our story when we were raising our first fund was, 'We were going to the moon, or we were going to leave a moon-sized crater in the ground, and there was no other option.' That's how we want to work with our founders as well." @illscience w/ @lennysan23d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet