Well, I mean Anthropic did previously cite RLM that's what caused all the credit-assignment arguments to snowball. The current workflows feature imho go a step *against* RLM (as precisely defined): less REPL more upfront-orchestration -- which is interesting concept to discuss if it wasn't for the naming disagreements!
As for the non-technical stuff, the discussion of research as discovery vs. invention is not one that's suitable for this format though ;-)
- No I meant tools like subagents, can see the blogs I linked too for examples but these are ideas in RLMs
- Well it’s not only the codebase but sure
Mainly getting at ppl not holding cursor and Anthropic to the same standard as they release blogposts on this stuff without citing previous works (not even sure which ones there are other than RLMs) Here referring to all the blogs I linked