VIEWS291RETWEETS1
Hüseyin S. Bozkurt,MD,AGAF@HSEYNSANCARBOZ1
@DrMorganLevine Biology is “alive “ , always can try to adapt to environment
7hViews 291Likes 2
Original post unavailable.
Sentiment
Users are divided over Doudna's claim that AI chatbots cannot innovate in biology, with some urging optimism that it is possible while others attack participants in the debate as disgruntled or using engagement bait.
Pos
50.0%
Neg
50.0%
2 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Digg Deeper
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
LIKES2
Jarod Rutledge@JarodRutledge1
@CRISPR_LuCas Most people probably didn't watch the clip, just reacted to the somewhat rage bate summary from the poster...
7hViews 28Likes 2
Anshul Kundaje@anshulkundaje
@CRISPR_LuCas @kenjmloi Locasale is an expert at engagement bait. He's a disgruntled ex academic. Spends all day giving his purposely misrepresented takes trying to dunk on academics & universities in general. Total loser who doesn't actually do anything useful with his time.
3hViews 6Likes 1
Félix Pastor@felix4better
@DrMorganLevine The literature bias point is key. In longevity research, landmark findings fail replication constantly. AI trained on that just amplifies noise.
7hViews 2
LushNature@LushNature1
@DrMorganLevine whats your advice for someone who wants to help with the sequential work necessary to help biology/longevity using AI? (before ASI parallelizes a lot of human work)
4h
VBio@vbvoid
@DrMorganLevine Be brave. Believe it is possible.
4h