Representative Lori Trahan urged Congress to formalize the oversight process.
i'm not saying that there need not be caution and oversight with the ai models, but this administration is demonstrating that they are among the least trustworthy governing bodies. not only is it foreseeable, it was foreseen.
where do we go from here?
Many users distrust the administration's AI oversight and model controls due to fears of instability, fascism, and donor favoritism, while a few praise warnings against hoarding frontier intelligence.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Now the Trump administration is deciding company by company who gets access to the newest AI model. No law. No process. No oversight. Just appointees in Washington deciding who's in and who's out. This haphazard approach is bad for safety, national security, and American innovation. Congress can't keep sitting on the sidelines of the AI debate. We need a real national strategy. Agencies staffed with technical experts, uniform guardrails for frontier models, and a lawful process for emergency action that answers to judicial review.
OpenAI will conduct a staggered, limited release of its latest model, as the Trump administration is still grappling with how it wants to regulate advanced models.
More from @Dareasmunhoz: https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/open-ai-new-model/
@BexelInitiative what fascist doesn't like super weapons that they get and others don't
idk how anyone was like yeah this dude is totally stable and we can trust him and he wont just do things on a whim depending on the last vizier to whisper into his ear. he's literally done multiple crypto rug pulls. i just wanted bumbling meme orange man, not footgun america to death orange man.
@DanielleFong I question whos instantiating this and why? Clearly maga nazis have no reason for this except for love of ccp maybe. My Reynolds Wrap argument would be that oai/ant and their benefactors are the engine behind it to pump for ipos, pump narrative, and defend against waning growth
SITUATION EXPLAINED: Government control of model releases is bad for everyone.
• Bad for accelerationists, obvious reasons • Bad for safetyists too, iterated deployment • Iterative deployment works because companies increase capabilities a little each time, people adapt, and companies learn from real world feedback how to make models more aligned • Imagine if Google DeepMind had been a siloed government project for 10 years, no ChatGPT, no nothing, and then suddenly Fable drops • People would lose their minds • Worse: if all AI research happens inside a few government bunkers and something goes wrong with a rogue AI, there's far less civilizational defense
@theojaffee: "Imagine a world where we had nothing, and then we had superintelligence. That would be really bad."
it seems insane. but probably there are a lot of people in the government that are somewhat disassociated from this that they were working with, that they learned to trust.
too bad Trump is president and they're literally working to use these powers to keep themselves in power . We are on a steep and slippery slope.
@DanielleFong Regime change.
Midterm elections are just months away. People who understand AI need to get involved at every level.
@MTSlive Very insightful stuff.
Stop the hoarding of frontier intelligence.
@MTSlive it's not bad for fascist governments and that's the point
@DanielleFong We can only hope the rest of the world starts building compute. If we're at the rsi stage it's likely too late to lead. But even being a year or two behind the frontier may be preferable to being locked at an arbitrary intelligence lvl dictated by the US or China.
@DanielleFong Eggsactlee
@MTSlive It's very good for those who have the scratch to make two comma (or more) donations to Super PACs/ballrooms/inaugurations, though...
