Users are excited by the joke imagining an OpenAI reasoning model serving as defense counsel in an Apple lawsuit because they find the 'thinking harder' strategy and realistic courtroom details highly entertaining.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 24 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@signulll 'thinking harder' as a legal strategy goes crazy tho and honestly the judge allowing it is the most realistic part 😭 😭
@WaryaWayne Highlights real business risks for OpenAI, including partnership fallout and IPO implications.
@signulll lol yes, yes please 😂 🙏
@ayyyk24 true!
openai should use 5.6 sol max effort as defense counsel in the apple lawsuit. just imagine the trial. judge: “counsel, your response?” openai: “one moment, your honor. the model is thinking.” apple: “objection.” openai: “thinking harder…” judge: “i’ll allow it.
@signulll 'thinking harder' as a legal strategy goes crazy tho and honestly the judge allowing it is the most realistic part 😭 😭
@WaryaWayne Highlights real business risks for OpenAI, including partnership fallout and IPO implications.
@ayyyk24 true!
openai should use 5.6 sol max effort as defense counsel in the apple lawsuit. just imagine the trial. judge: “counsel, your response?” openai: “one moment, your honor. the model is thinking.” apple: “objection.” openai: “thinking harder…” judge: “i’ll allow it.
Kidding aside, is this allowed in courts these days? https://twitter.com/signulll/status/2076023739959869904
Users are excited by the joke imagining an OpenAI reasoning model serving as defense counsel in an Apple lawsuit because they find the 'thinking harder' strategy and realistic courtroom details highly entertaining.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 24 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Kidding aside, is this allowed in courts these days? https://twitter.com/signulll/status/2076023739959869904