I got the anon feedback below yesterday (thank you!) and would like to share it and explain, as I believe many people might have the same opinion, many might not know the reasons, and it applies to most industry researchers.
[now go read the screenshot before proceeding]
In theory i fully agree with this, it would be nice. In practice however, this is not possible, for almost anyone, in almost all companies and certainly in all BigCos. I never discuss nonpublic technical work, neither now at Meta, nor previously at OpenAI or Google/DeepMind.
Unless you are the product owner, (which i am not and have never been, Alex Wang is here. Another good example is Tibo on Codex.), you simply are by default not allowed to talk publicly about future plans or things that are in progress. You may only discuss what is public already or what has been approved to be made public. Like i would love to share with you some of the things i do/use/see/plan internally, but I'm simply not allowed to!
In the past research years that may have looked a little less so but it's really the same: you only talk about the research you published, which went through an approval process to be allowed to be published. Same for talks. And when you talk about future plans in the context of research, it's about your personal opinion of the future of the field, which is (a priori) unrelated to what the company does, hence it's fine.
With bigco industrial research closing down more over the past few years, most things that you can discuss then are "events that happen" which is papers, general community stuff, other company (or people) news/rumors, and that's about it.
I do think i could post a bit more general technical commentary (and tone down Schmidhubering), but it would not be related to Meta's unpublished work, since i can't talk about that.
At the same time, I'm here mostly to relax, which explains the regular shitposting :)









