Many users dismissed Kimi-K3's 39% FrontierMath Tier 4 score as underwhelming because it highlights a large gap behind US models and invites sarcastic doubts about Chinese AI progress.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 60 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@scaling01 That doesn't change the fact that it's better than GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.8, and that in many areas it's on par with Fable and GPT-5.6.
@scaling01 7% behind after 7 months of runway, does that close or widen if Kimi ships another version this quarter?
@scaling01 Scores like garbage on our internal sports science / engineering benchmarks as well. Worse than K2.6 even.
@scaling01 Ainda bem que eu não vou usar ele para fazer conta, e sim para programar.
@scaling01 there's a very disappointed Asian father somewhere in Beijing.
Kimi-K3 (max) scores only 39% on FrontierMath Tier 4 7% lower than the best US models from 7 months ago
I have little use for Frontier Math tier 4
Many users dismissed Kimi-K3's 39% FrontierMath Tier 4 score as underwhelming because it highlights a large gap behind US models and invites sarcastic doubts about Chinese AI progress.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 60 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@scaling01 I wonder how Qwen does now