Positive users thank critics for insights on DeepMind dropping its 2014 military ban for a Pentagon contract, while negative users insult those critics for opposing government deals.
Based on 43 visible X reactions from 159 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@BlackHC An amazing thread Andreas. Thank you for the insights and the personal touch. Keep up the good work and protect your independent mind.
2:35 AM · Jul 15, 2026@BlackHC So why are crying over on social media. Go back to work ane ship us good AI you weak faggot
6:09 AM · Jul 15, 2026@BlackHC Thanks for shedding light on this so thoughtfully.
7:05 AM · Jul 15, 2026Solidarity. Kudos to Andreas 💐 Thousands of us at Google organized against the company’s Maven contract nearly 10 years ago, even though principles like this existed. We saw no hope that such principles would survive bottom line pressure—nor were they legally drafted to do so. A publicly traded company like Google has the objective function of maximizing growth and revenue, not leaving money on the table especially in ways that would antagonize the state. Now reflect on the use to which the state can put AI and tech’s global surveillance infrastructure beyond. Those are the stakes. It was clear then and is only cleared now that we need leverage beyond Big Tech or the state to curb this perilous combo. Since neither Big Tech nor government are incentivized to make the safe, reasoned, technically grounded, human rights preserving choices when billions of dollars and geopolitical advantage hang in the balance.
5:30 AM · Jul 15, 2026The 2014 ban on military applications was superseded by defense agreements.
Solidarity. Kudos to Andreas 💐 Thousands of us at Google organized against the company’s Maven contract nearly 10 years ago, even though principles like this existed. We saw no hope that such principles would survive bottom line pressure—nor were they legally drafted to do so. A publicly traded company like Google has the objective function of maximizing growth and revenue, not leaving money on the table especially in ways that would antagonize the state. Now reflect on the use to which the state can put AI and tech’s global surveillance infrastructure beyond. Those are the stakes. It was clear then and is only cleared now that we need leverage beyond Big Tech or the state to curb this perilous combo. Since neither Big Tech nor government are incentivized to make the safe, reasoned, technically grounded, human rights preserving choices when billions of dollars and geopolitical advantage hang in the balance.
5:30 AM · Jul 15, 2026"Safety isn't about governance structures. I mean, even if you have a governance board, it probably wouldn't do the right thing when it came to the crunch." — Demis Hassabis, quoted in Mallaby's "The Infinity Machine" The Pentagon contract is the litmus test of that bet.
5:52 AM · Jul 15, 2026Positive users thank critics for insights on DeepMind dropping its 2014 military ban for a Pentagon contract, while negative users insult those critics for opposing government deals.
Based on 43 visible X reactions from 159 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
"Safety isn't about governance structures. I mean, even if you have a governance board, it probably wouldn't do the right thing when it came to the crunch." — Demis Hassabis, quoted in Mallaby's "The Infinity Machine" The Pentagon contract is the litmus test of that bet.
5:52 AM · Jul 15, 2026