He says the current intervention methods erode user trust.
I am curious if the new Fable safegaurds would trigger accidentally on meaningfully important work as a false positive that has a real life consequence.
Just realizing this is eroding trust and please change this to just down right blocking which is a fine position to take. Respect the user’s time.
Many users criticized Fable safeguards for triggering false positives that block legitimate work like research or biology questions, eroding trust through opaque and overly cautious moderation.
@_arohan_ Claude refuses to work on my master thesis on model alignment. Either fable 5 straight up refuses or it switches to a dummer model, which then also refuses
@_arohan_ It is actually doing it (trigger accidentally on meaningful important work as a false positive) right now, as we see many cases on the feed
I am curious if the new Fable safegaurds would trigger accidentally on meaningfully important work as a false positive that has a real life consequence.
Just realizing this is eroding trust and please change this to just down right blocking which is a fine position to take. Respect the user’s time.
@_arohan_ Anthropic wants to decide what's good for you and what's safe. They want a monopoly on AI so they can make all the money and all the decisions. They love the idea of locking out anybody they consider dangerous. Imagine if the internet or electricity was handled like this.
@_arohan_ I would bot trust them if i they where not my costumer, you truly dont know how fare that goes, corupting tools compaditors use.
@_arohan_ Literally any questions about biology trigger them. It can't even analyze my bloodwork! It can't even explain what a mitochondria is!
@_arohan_ so ur saying the safeguard is worse than just blocking outright because at least blocking is honest about it
@_arohan_ the trust erosion is the real problem. false positives feel worse than honest censorship when the stakes are actual.
@_arohan_
@_arohan_ @infoxiao https://www.reddit.com/u/Consistent-Doubt-268/s/bdKdLFEhBC
@yash1_ @_arohan_ I respectfully appeal this decision as I think it may have been an error.
@_arohan_ false positives in moderation always kill trust faster than the problem theyre solving
opaque decisions are the real issue here
@_arohan_ "Trust erodes once and rarely rebuilds"
making the distinction between nsfw censorship vs functional safeguards feels like a pretty reasonable ask
@_arohan_ over-cautious moderation always hits the wrong things first
why is letting people block worse than breaking actual work?
@_arohan_ this is actually a solid point. the vague scoring thing makes it worse no one knows why they got flagged.
He says the current intervention methods erode user trust.
I am curious if the new Fable safegaurds would trigger accidentally on meaningfully important work as a false positive that has a real life consequence.
Just realizing this is eroding trust and please change this to just down right blocking which is a fine position to take. Respect the user’s time.
