The Financial Times describes a case for resisting smart glasses, even if a revolt may not succeed.
The Financial Times’ opinion piece, “Will the ‘glassholes’ finally win?”, says a revolt against smart glasses may not succeed—but argues that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t try.
40.3K
1 post, first seen 4d ago
The Financial Times describes a case for resisting smart glasses, even if a revolt may not succeed.
The Financial Times’ opinion piece, “Will the ‘glassholes’ finally win?”, says a revolt against smart glasses may not succeed—but argues that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t try.
Financial Times@FTA revolt against smart glasses may not succeed — but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try, says Robert Shrimsley: https://ft.trib.al/RyasQA1
Financial Times@FTA revolt against smart glasses may not succeed — but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try, says Robert Shrimsley: https://ft.trib.al/RyasQA1