Fable's very good, though the change is a bit less dramatic than I might have expected based on how it was described by Ants
Perhaps because of some combination of 1. They rarely use other companies' models (e.g. 5.5), 2. They never really used Opus 4.8 Max bc they had Mythos
(and, in turn, Opus 4.8 Max had a lot of Mythos's intelligence baked into it already)
Fable's very good, though the change is a bit less dramatic than I might have expected based on how it was described by Ants
Perhaps because of some combination of 1. They rarely use other companies' models (e.g. 5.5), 2. They never really used Opus 4.8 Max bc they had Mythos
*I'm talking about vague subjective descriptions from individual Ants on social media, not saying the evals/misuse risks etc. were exaggerated in official blog posts/system cards etc.
Though I think officially framing it as a step change was maybe ill-advised given the Opus 4.8 thing
(and, in turn, Opus 4.8 Max had a lot of Mythos's intelligence baked into it already)
@Miles_Brundage wait so ur saying the jump from mythos wasnt that dramatic because they were already on something close to fable internally
@Miles_Brundage interesting how being locked into one model can warp the whole reference frame
@Miles_Brundage heard antidoto is a newer sphinx from model jump maybe that fits with it better
Fable's very good, though the change is a bit less dramatic than I might have expected based on how it was described by Ants
Perhaps because of some combination of 1. They rarely use other companies' models (e.g. 5.5), 2. They never really used Opus 4.8 Max bc they had Mythos