He warns centralized leaders risk diverging from public interest.
If I had to choose between a businessman driven by profit and a power player determined to shape humanity’s future, I’d take the former: they at least have to listen to customers. The latter is far scarier when their vision isn’t yours.
But neither is the answer. We need democratic AI and open-source models.
Some users support open-source AI models to advance science while others fear the advocacy resembles a dangerous cult or self-proclaimed savior.
@xwang_lk in our world we often see the both kinds in one person and the answer remains true, we need open science to move forward
@xwang_lk Throughout history, many times the person who eventually destroyed the world claimed to be the savior in the beginning.
If I had to choose between a businessman driven by profit and a power player determined to shape humanity’s future, I’d take the former: they at least have to listen to customers. The latter is far scarier when their vision isn’t yours.
But neither is the answer. We need democratic AI and open-source models.
@xwang_lk A cult if far scarier than a greedy capitalist.
@xwang_lk But can we guarantee that these models will not be exploited by terrorists and the criminal underworld?
He warns centralized leaders risk diverging from public interest.
If I had to choose between a businessman driven by profit and a power player determined to shape humanity’s future, I’d take the former: they at least have to listen to customers. The latter is far scarier when their vision isn’t yours.
But neither is the answer. We need democratic AI and open-source models.
