Many users dismiss superhuman AI as useless to most people because current tools feel untrustworthy, generic, or irrelevant to daily tasks, while a few view the narrow adoption gap as a future advantage.
Based on 11 visible X reactions from 19 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@behrendtio @Austen its not about educating people... its about making the tools actually useful and not crap. like... lets say it actually does make charts for you accurately... well i still cant use that because i cant be SURE it is accurate.
@Austen The wild thing is that even among X users there are comments under that specific post saying something along the lines of "why would I pay for AI?". We are living in the age of NPCs.
@behrendtio @Austen for writing? ai writing is certifiably crappy. and also nit my voice. so... useless.i dont need more corporate boilerplate crap. i need less of it actually.
@Austen That gap may become the biggest advantage of the next decade. A small group will use AI aggressively while everyone else waits for it to become normal.
@Austen that's such a good point, most people just want tools that work for their daily tasks
@Austen I used grok-4.5 and it was insanely bad...
The wild thing is that even if some new AI model has absolute superhuman intelligence only a tiny fraction of the human population would rush to use it
@Austen Most people have not oriented their life around being smart, nor do they leverage intelligence, so a super thinking machine is genuinely not very useful to a lot of people
Many users dismiss superhuman AI as useless to most people because current tools feel untrustworthy, generic, or irrelevant to daily tasks, while a few view the narrow adoption gap as a future advantage.
Based on 11 visible X reactions from 19 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.