AI is too important to be left to politicians
Cosmos Institute founder Brendan McCord says AI governance is too important to be left solely to politicians
He advocates for balancing policy with technical and philosophical expertise.
Many users agree AI is too important to leave to politicians alone because they see a need to close the pacing gap and have faith in new private institutions and community efforts.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity

@Brendan_McCord And too important for them to be behind. Time to close the pacing problem.

@BWarburg Many in the Cosmos community!!
We will write a post about it soon

@Brendan_McCord It sounded to me like a plea for an unregulated sector. There's a breadth of difference though between commanding a sector of the economy and regulating it, and something so powerful cannot be left in the hands of a few unaccountable CEOs either.

@BWarburg Paleolithic emotions Medieval institutions God like technology
FWIW I do have faith in new institutions. But I think they will mostly arise from the private sector

@Brendan_McCord Exactly the inverse; the common good is sovereign over any private corporation, and the people alone have the final right to regulate commerce by means of their elected representatives through duly established laws. A bit like saying nukes can't be left to politicians.

@Brendan_McCord Which new forms give you faith?

Its a riff on Clemenceau’s “war is too important to be left to the generals.”nothing that consequential should sit in custody of a single class
1. Rule of law and politicians are different things
2. “the people” shouldn’t be equated with “their representatives.” Self-govt runs through more channels than the ballot (science, markets, the press, civil society, etc)
The precedent for placing politicians in custody of a general-purpose thinking technology is the printing press - the Licensing Acts. Led to censorship + cartel

@Brendan_McCord Thank you for your clarifying reply, though. I was reading it in the tone of certain silicon valley voices who seem to think the future of this technology should be their sole and only prerogative.