Wassname Runs ML Benchmark on Fable 5.1
Wassname posted benchmark results comparing Fable 5.1 to the prior version.
@wassname shared results from wassname-ml-bench after testing Fable 5.1 for machine learning use. The post states the new version performed better than Fable 5. @xlr8harder retweeted the update, which focuses on open source AI models. The original message noted the test was run to check whether the release improved capabilities or had been limited. No further details or comparisons appear in the visible post.
Combined views
21
1 post, first seen 3h ago
Wassname Runs ML Benchmark on Fable 5.1
Wassname posted benchmark results comparing Fable 5.1 to the prior version.
@wassname shared results from wassname-ml-bench after testing Fable 5.1 for machine learning use. The post states the new version performed better than Fable 5. @xlr8harder retweeted the update, which focuses on open source AI models. The original message noted the test was run to check whether the release improved capabilities or had been limited. No further details or comparisons appear in the visible post.
Reactions
1 postWA 
wassname@wassnameI was curious if fable 5.1 was better or nerfed for ML. So I ran wassname-ml-bench. It's better than Fable 5, and on par with Opus 5 at machine learning. Also Anthropic improved their refusals and Fable 5 went from 2/12 -> 0/12 refusals. Fable 5.1 was at 1/12 refusals
- likes: 5
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 2