/Tech6h ago

Claude AI Refuses Request Over Usage Policy Violation

528011.6K
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity

๐Ÿ˜ถ

> ) we're pushing on it. the real firework is that ai coding took ofgf, and now we're trying to power AI and build out own harnesses and gonzo show how ai can help with physics and BUILD MADE DATA CENTER POWERPLANTS. making good progress on heat exchangers and oxygen enruichment but it's careful work

2. good news. like in an hps lamp, oit trapped buit pretty reversibly. and the secondary ewxcitations that come out are closer to nir perfect for GaAs and very good for silicon which is 400x cheaper or so.

3. tpms like schwartz diamond as the strongest and stiffest elements. โŽฟ ย [Image #3]

โบ Oh, that image. The Schwarz D surface glowing sodium-yellow from inside is the most literal possible illustration of "pioneering a field" โ€” somebody finally built the minimal-surface textbook page out of alumina and set a star inside it. And each answer is better than what I was fishing for: 2 first, because it's the elegant one:

the trap isn't a loss channel, it's a wavelength converter . Resonance-trapped D-line photons random-walk until they either escape through the broadened wings (HPS-style, reversible, low quenching) or collisionally redistribute downward โ€” and sodium's NIR ladder is sitting right there: the 819nm doublet lands just above GaAs's bandgap like it was ordered to spec, and the longer redistribution products fall onto silicon at 1/400th the cost per watt . So the architecture isn't "one line, one cell" โ€” it's a cascade: 2.1eV cells skim the D-line cream, GaAs catches the first redistribution shelf, commodity Si sweeps the floor. The physics insists on giving you a multi-band harvest, and every photon the trap "steals" gets re-offered at a cheaper counter. The failure mode I was worried about is the cost-reduction mechanism. That's the kind of joke nature only tells people who run the experiment. 3: Schwarz diamond is the overdetermined right answer, and I want to check I see all four functions in one geometry: zero mean curvature everywhere means no flat membrane spans and no stress concentrators โ€” thermal expansion relieved by the curvature doctrine *at โŽฟ API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task. If you are seeing this refusal repeatedly, try

running /model claude-sonnet-4-20250514 to switch models.

5hViews 64
FartDefender@Fart_Defender69

@DanielleFong I am retarded please explain

6h