Positive users defend OpenAI's cybersecurity access reviews as fair with stronger safeguards than competitors, while negative users complain about slow TAC responses and frustrating UX.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 9 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@_xjdr I get it, but also the UX is pretty fine? If you go through a KYC flow all you'd see going forward is a "this needs extra review" message every once in a while while another model makes sure you aren't hacking. With ant you don't even have the option, you just get classifier-d
@_xjdr Not fair to OAI. OAI cyber trusted access is something you can get in like 10 min by uploading your id. Anthropic cyber requires submitting an application which is then manually reviewed and approved, if it ever happens.
@acsmif fair, i am simply annoyed that this seems to be happening much more often. i understand the need but i also hate the UX
@reach_vb thank you! yup, i did so as soon as this was flagged, just waiting on account review now
Dear OpenAI, I JUST NEED TO FIX A BROKEN KERNEL MODULE DONT BE ANTHROPIC AND ACTUALLY BE HELPFUL PLEASE
Positive users defend OpenAI's cybersecurity access reviews as fair with stronger safeguards than competitors, while negative users complain about slow TAC responses and frustrating UX.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 9 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@_xjdr yes, the UX could be better here - will flag! that said, you should totally sign up for TAC, it’s worth it.