Users criticized LLMs for polishing academic papers because the tools are really bad beyond catching typos and require clear user knowledge to avoid flawed output.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@srchvrs How... The tools are really bad. They can catch typos. But you need quite clear knoedge of what you want, when you just let them loose, they fill your writing with elaborate sentences, extra fluff, not exactly the same arguments... I totally understand why some go each direction
What's the motivation of people to not use LLMs to polish their writing and make it more understandable and idiomatic? So many poorly written papers. It's completely unforgivable in the era of ChatGPT when everyone can produce native speaker quality English prose. PS: I don't suggest direct generation of papers using LLM, only careful postediting and draft revision.
@srchvrs How... The tools are really bad. They can catch typos. But you need quite clear knoedge of what you want, when you just let them loose, they fill your writing with elaborate sentences, extra fluff, not exactly the same arguments... I totally understand why some go each direction
What's the motivation of people to not use LLMs to polish their writing and make it more understandable and idiomatic? So many poorly written papers. It's completely unforgivable in the era of ChatGPT when everyone can produce native speaker quality English prose. PS: I don't suggest direct generation of papers using LLM, only careful postediting and draft revision.
Users criticized LLMs for polishing academic papers because the tools are really bad beyond catching typos and require clear user knowledge to avoid flawed output.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.