Some users backed the AI safety advocate's push for a safe singularity to enable rapid gains like curing diseases, while many others rejected it as causing stagnation, an impossible ban, or inhumane value lock-in.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 29 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@tenobrus there are various things i want as soon as possible (cure all diseases including aging, end war and poverty, probably plenty of other things) but i'm not sure handing over power is one of them per se
@tenobrus Non corrigble: i.e. Eternal Values Lock In. That's the most inhumane and anti transhuman and anti post human thing ever.
@tenobrus Absolutely not. We will not accept the dominion of an Abominable Intelligence.
@tenobrus Your human flourishing looks like human stagnation.
@tenobrus there are various things i want as soon as possible (cure all diseases including aging, end war and poverty, probably plenty of other things) but i'm not sure handing over power is one of them per se
@tenobrus Non corrigble: i.e. Eternal Values Lock In. That's the most inhumane and anti transhuman and anti post human thing ever.
@tenobrus I extremely strongly disagree.
@tenobrus 100%
making sure it's safe could be worth much more than 15 years delay, depending. but delaying forever is absolutely not desirable and is in fact incredibly incredibly costly.
Some users backed the AI safety advocate's push for a safe singularity to enable rapid gains like curing diseases, while many others rejected it as causing stagnation, an impossible ban, or inhumane value lock-in.
Based on 7 visible X reactions from 29 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@tenobrus 100%
making sure it's safe could be worth much more than 15 years delay, depending. but delaying forever is absolutely not desirable and is in fact incredibly incredibly costly.