Many users praised Sam Altman's claim that AI has been net job-creating so far for matching data with clean logic and signaling rapid future gains, while some called AI still too unreliable to replace permanent human roles.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@willdepue lol yes that's what im saying it is weird for sama to look at the impact of ai today and say the impact might be similar in 3 years
@willdepue ai is still terrible tho its not like you can hire one like a human and trust it to work continuously to do a permanent job
@talentdensity brother. straight lines on a graph. go talk to gpt-xl. that model couldn’t do sentences. just give it 3 years
@willdepue The fact this is just the beginning is still a lot to take in
@willdepue Clean logic. Matches the data so far.
@willdepue let’s hope this is true
so far at least, i'm pretty sure AI has been net job-creating. this was not what i expected--although i was much less pessimistic than others, i thought by this level of capability we'd have seen some impact. it is possible this direction keeps going!
ai creates economic growth. economic growth creates jobs (more jobs than ai fills), ai creates jobs (until the end) https://twitter.com/sama/status/2076036901824532530
@sama @HeyPeterClarke The work we do will keep expanding in scope, scale and complexity to use up the available capacity for intellectual work.
Many users praised Sam Altman's claim that AI has been net job-creating so far for matching data with clean logic and signaling rapid future gains, while some called AI still too unreliable to replace permanent human roles.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@willdepue let’s hope this is true