Positive users highlight LLMs as superb translators across coding tasks while negative users express alarm about agents magnifying engineer value without replacing them.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 5 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@fchollet At the end of the day, these are language models. They excel at language tasks, and translation is one of them. LLMs are therefore superb translators: from one human language to another, from human language to programming code, from informal proof descriptions to Lean, and so on.
Oh no. Oh no...
Since there will be many replies about the value of junior engineers dropping to zero: if you have ever been on teams with a mix of strong senior engineers and junior engineers, you should know their value was already zero or negative in the mix -- the point is that they gain competence over time and eventually become senior themselves.
Because coding agents are best understood as very fast, relatively cheap executors with weak (or absent) creative decision-making, they act as a force magnifier for competent engineers. They're not replacing engineers, they're making engineers more valuable.
Positive users highlight LLMs as superb translators across coding tasks while negative users express alarm about agents magnifying engineer value without replacing them.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 5 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.