/TECH

Expert Slams Low-Quality BioML Papers at ICML and Major Conferences

Commentary on X

Highest ranked

I have a pile of "peer reviewed" papers from the last 2 years that I really think have serious issues that need to be exposed since I'm seeing many of the flaws propagate in other work. Hard to find the time to write critiques for all of these.

Combined views

5.8K

2 posts, first seen 4h ago

59 likes7 comments

Anshul Kundaje@anshulkundajeTECH

Some of the accepted bioML papers are truly egregiously terrible. That's been the case at all the major ML conferences over the last many years. There was even a paper that won some kind of award last year at one of the conferences that was just chok full of fatal flaws. https://twitter.com/mattgdean03/status/2074710547430547470

9 saves

4 reposts

Sentiment

Positive0%100%Negative

Positive Read

Negative users criticize low-quality BioML papers at ICML and major conferences, arguing many recent peer-reviewed works contain serious issues that need exposing.

Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.