Combined views
8K
5 posts, first seen 8h ago
25 likes
8K
5 posts, first seen 8h ago
Users support integrating AI mastery into school curricula rather than banning tools because it shifts focus to judgment skills and makes exams test deeper understanding instead of memorization.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 7 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
I agree with Brian too. But I think you can do a mix, especially now in the interim. Have in class exams and start figure out how to have students lean into AI and use it. The teachers need to think out of the box and assume people will use Ai. The biggest problem, is that many of the students, especially undergrads just want the credential and honestly many classes are extremely boring. I’ve learned a lot about quantum physics from AI, much more than I would have without it. But I wanted to learn. The thing is students need to both learn and learn how to use Ai effectively. That’s on the schools now
@omooretweets Honestly, if an exam falls apart because students can ask ChatGPT, the exam was probably testing the wrong layer. Let them use the tool, then make them defend the assumptions, catch bad outputs, and explain the answer without sounding like the model.
@omooretweets judgment is the real curriculum now. knowing when to override the ai > knowing what to memorize
Hot take - students will have AI in the real world, and they should be able to use it in school too Most of my time as an Econ major was spent memorizing things I never use or could easily look up This is a good opportunity to reinvent curricula around building valuable skills https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2075031014628311236
Hot take - the student with the biggest performance delta is doing things right 👀 Most of my time as an Econ major was spent memorizing things I never use or could easily look up This is a good opportunity to reinvent curricula around building valuable skills https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2075031014628311236
Students failed an in-person final after using AI on midterms.
I agree with Brian too. But I think you can do a mix, especially now in the interim. Have in class exams and start figure out how to have students lean into AI and use it. The teachers need to think out of the box and assume people will use Ai. The biggest problem, is that many of the students, especially undergrads just want the credential and honestly many classes are extremely boring. I’ve learned a lot about quantum physics from AI, much more than I would have without it. But I wanted to learn. The thing is students need to both learn and learn how to use Ai effectively. That’s on the schools now
Hot take - the student with the biggest performance delta is doing things right 👀 Most of my time as an Econ major was spent memorizing things I never use or could easily look up This is a good opportunity to reinvent curricula around building valuable skills https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2075031014628311236
Fascinating graph https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2075031014628311236
Users support integrating AI mastery into school curricula rather than banning tools because it shifts focus to judgment skills and makes exams test deeper understanding instead of memorization.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 7 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Fascinating graph https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2075031014628311236