A long-running debate about the role of AI at war pits those who hope AI will reduce mistakes in war, save lives and deliver victories against campaigners and experts who worry that speeding through targets will make war worse and lead to greater civilian harm.

There is also debate about the extent to which technology companies should be privy to how their AI tools are used and whether they should be held responsible for outputs that result in mistakes.

@BelalFromGaza @KatrinaManson got it, thanks for the nudge on that note

@lvn_crypto @KatrinaManson Please Quote and donate 🙏

“There’s a lot of governance pieces that, in my opinion, are missing,” Jack Shanahan, ret US general and former director of Project Maven, the Pentagon effort that birthed Maven Smart System, told a Stanford University workshop devoted to the future of decision-making last week.

@KatrinaManson this disowning feels off

“If you make more decisions rather than the right decisions, you may have a very flawed decision-making process,” Shanahan said, warning that integrating Claude into Maven Smart System could lead to unexpected impacts and dilute the role of human judgment.

@KatrinaManson