This is an insane paper and I love it
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31514
This is an insane paper and I love it
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31514
Many users praised the paper on neural networks in Age of Empires II that Yann LeCun highlighted for its clever arguments, while some dismissed it as sophistry or narrowminded fallacies.

@MilesCranmer Reminds me of one of the greats;

I think the basic issue in all such discussions is that these kinds of competencies aren't some kind of essential "human attributes". Measuring cognitive properties by humans is myopic and causes all kinds of pseudoproblems. The emerging field of diverse intelligence has better frameworks. A spectrum of highly variable intelligences, and lots of research on which kinds of architectures enable which kinds of patterns (of behavior, of computation, of physiology, etc.), is more useful for discussions of natural, artificial, and hybrid agents of varying provenance and composition. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201/full http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00902/full?&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=196518 and more at https://drmichaellevin.org/publications/behavior.html, plus lots of other good labs.

@MilesCranmer burying the real result:
> Age of Empires II is ... Turing-complete.

@MilesCranmer The study invalidates LLM research built on preset human-like characteristics. After building an in-game neural network in Age of Empires II, the authors find perceived AI anthropomorphism stems mainly from interface design instead of inherent properties. https://www.openread.academy/en/paper/reading?corpusId=549270147

@MilesCranmer Very old idea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain

@MilesCranmer as an entity in the greater boston area, I have also been suspicious of my human-like attributes

@MilesCranmer Any Turing complete system can obviously run (with sufficient scale) an LLM. That's really all they've shown there. It's different from what an LLM is esp. post training. It is that training on human inputs and outputs that aligns it with the human mind.

It's absurdist, perhaps satirical. He's arguing against illogical reasoning of AI functionists, who claim that consciousness is an emergent property of LLMs, by showing that a large collection of digital coats could also exhibit the same emerging consciousness (this is proven, not theoretical).
The inference here is that one must use measurements to determine if there is truly emergent consciousness. For instance, computing the phi of an LLM (integrated information theory). I find this interesting, haven't seen it discussed before.
One could break the LLM in half (so to speak) at some particular link and determine how much does that constrain the past possible state of its inputs. Do this recursively for all of its weights (a big job but tractable) and measure its phi. High phi indicates emerging consciousness. Simple.
@MilesCranmer @skdh 😅😅😅
This is an insane paper and I love it
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31514

@MilesCranmer It’s not LEGO or Age of Empires…it’s a neural net. LLMs are made of neural nets. All neural nets are brain-like by design. This is idiotic. They should have done it with LEGO for it to make sense.

@MilesCranmer https://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/USAconscious.htm

very clever. this is basically a repackaging of Kant's theory that "the unity of aperception" is a priori in order for any perception to occur. this is the source of Anthropomorphic projection. in a sense, according to Kant the very first object of Anthropomorphization is always *yourself*. You have to imagine yourself as "a singular conscious thing that exists and can receive experiences" in order for you to have this thought in the first place. Got that? Anthropomorphism about yourself is *required* in order to have anthropormophism about external "beings."
this is why i've always said, if you think you're "into AI", like really deep into theory, but if you have not read Kant, then you don't know a damn thing about anything. You have no map, you have no blueprint, you don't know who you are or where you're going with AI. Without the Kantian framework you are blind and stumbling around in the dark.

@NeuroTechnoWtch @MilesCranmer Legos arranged in a giant network structure to form the Death Star and basic blocks arranged in a giant network structure to form Age of Empires have just as much connectivity as a neural net and just as much right to be taken seriously and have their welfare considered.

@ergelgru @MilesCranmer he cites this as the inspiration for the title

@MilesCranmer This is glorious. One of my favorite reads since an FMRI of a dead salmon. https://law.stanford.edu/2009/09/18/what-a-dead-salmon-reminds-us-about-fmri-analysis/

@MilesCranmer A modified "cha-cha" dance with an infinite memory tape is Turing Complete.
Computational universality allows for weird stuff.
One could run Doom on a brain organoid.

@ergelgru @MilesCranmer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxE5CwnmLCI lil b speaks of this

@MilesCranmer AoE II is a bridge between Trebuchets and AI!

@MilesCranmer The answer to all of these “system A can’t possibly be conscious because just look at it” is it might have some “human-like qualities” but the quantity is 10^-100 so as far as the ability to do the NYT crossword puzzle it’s effectively zero.

@MilesCranmer Hey, that’s exactly what I was thinking a while back. Why don’t we have more games that actually force LLM to stick to a strict regimen and consequences? The Sims series and SimCity are great examples, and as the AoE paper shows, there are others that do this really well.
This is an insane paper and I love it
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31514