Everyone is arguing about what AI will replace.
And forgetting it’s very good at helping you find the one thing you’re uniquely good at.
Then compressing 10,000 hours of expertise into weeks.
Everyone is arguing about what AI will replace.
And forgetting it’s very good at helping you find the one thing you’re uniquely good at.
Then compressing 10,000 hours of expertise into weeks.
Positive users support embracing AI to accelerate careers via more ambition and learning, while negative users critique the 'skip the ladder' framing for overlooking job-market barriers and needing judgment.

@ccatalini Exactly. More reps and more learning.

@ccatalini It completely changes how we define expertise

@ccatalini Speed without judgment fails.

@ccatalini AI is better as a mirror than a shortcut

@awrigh01 🔥

@ccatalini most of us think these tools are here to replace us instead of thinking how we can use them to improve our

@Celesweb3 Yes but it can mirror back what an average expert in the field would do

the "skip the ladder" framing assumes the ladder still has rungs.
22-25 cohort job-finding rate is down 14% since march. anthropic's own economists published it.
the tools are real. the on-ramp problem is also real. both exist in the same report.
compressing 10,000 hours is great if someone opens the door to let you use it.

@Romiinft Yes. Many times greater ambition
Everyone is arguing about what AI will replace.
And forgetting it’s very good at helping you find the one thing you’re uniquely good at.
Then compressing 10,000 hours of expertise into weeks.