Users appreciate Sonar's acquisition of Gitar as an AI-native code review tool for its simplicity after long experience with SonarQube.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Users appreciate Sonar's acquisition of Gitar as an AI-native code review tool for its simplicity after long experience with SonarQube.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
I've been working with SonarQube for a long time, and they just acquired Gitar:
https://fandf.co/4dZlFmT
Gitar is an AI-native code review tool, and what I like about it is how simple it is to use:
1. You install it 2. It automatically reviews every PR 3. It can autonomously approve/merge based on your config 4. If CI fails, it tells you where and why (code, test, infrastructure, etc.) 5. If you ask it to fix a problem, it will generate the fix, run the CI, and commit once the build passes.
Gitar works natively within your GitHub interface: inline comments and PR summaries all happen directly in the PR thread. There's also a separate app dashboard for team-level analytics and insights.
This is a no-brainer. Using SonarQube + Gitar is like hiring a 24/7 engineer that automatically checks all your code before it becomes a problem.
Bonus points: it doesn't store or train with your code. It loads it for review, then destroys the container.
Thanks to the Sonar team for partnering with me on this post.
If you are reviewing 100% of your AI-generated code by hand, you aren't moving fast enough.
It's just impossible.
Reviewing code has become the biggest bottleneck in software.
Here is how to make this better: