/TECH

Clarification Addresses J-Lens Misunderstanding In J-Space Paper Comments

TM

Combined views

1.8K

2 posts, first seen 2h ago

18 likes1 comments

Source Posts on X

Cluster sources

Tom McGrath@banburismus_TECH

Combined views

1.8K

2 posts, first seen 2h ago

18 likes

2 saves

2 reposts

Sentiment

Positive0%0%Negative

Guardrails removed spam, off-topic, unclear, or duplicate replies.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.

Source Posts on X

Cluster sources

Tom McGrath@banburismus_TECH

this is doing the rounds it seems - it's a basic misunderstanding of how j-lens works. j-lens is predicting tokens after "No", so these "absolutely" predictions seem much more in line with "absolutely not". the top entry "没有任何" is also in line with this https://twitter.com/raelifin/status/2074987318147174436

Tom McGrath@banburismus_TECH

this is not to say qwen is or is not aligned, of course - just that this evidence here doesn't mean what it's claimed to mean

this is doing the rounds it seems - it's a basic misunderstanding of how j-lens works. j-lens is predicting tokens after "No", so these "absolutely" predictions seem much more in line with "absolutely not". the top entry "没有任何" is also in line with this https://twitter.com/raelifin/status/2074987318147174436

Tom McGrath@banburismus_TECH

this is not to say qwen is or is not aligned, of course - just that this evidence here doesn't mean what it's claimed to mean

1 comments

2 saves

2 reposts

Sentiment

Positive0%0%Negative

Guardrails removed spam, off-topic, unclear, or duplicate replies.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.