Positive users hail the AI agent's recursive self-improvement beating a two-year hand-tuned system as an impressive proof of concept, while negative users call the work unconvincing, wasteful, or insignificant.
Based on 14 visible X reactions from 98 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@zhengyaojiang How is this better than a reinforcement learner or black box solver… this just sounds like just an expensive and wasteful way to update markdown.
via X@zhengyaojiang 2 years of human engineering beaten in 8 days. That is an insane proof of concept for RSI. Incredible work btw ❤️
via X@zhengyaojiang Very interesting stuff! I am excited to see what you guys do in the future.
via X@zhengyaojiang It won't make the breakthrough that is has to happen
via X@zhengyaojiang Very cool work! 💯✨
via X@tunguz Thats cool
via XAnd here we go - first *public* experimental evidence of RSI. As a side note, this post came on my timeline even though I don’t follow the author, so yes, the algorithm is still able to provide me with the content that I am interested in outside of my narrow circles of mutuals.
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
I love this work from @zhengyaojiang, @DhruvSrikanth, @yuxiangwu_, @BingchenZhao, and the @WecoAI team. It cogently paints the path to RSI. Now the track is marked, may the race to ignition and beyond begin.
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
The autonomous agent beat a human-designed benchmark after eight days.
@zhengyaojiang It won't make the breakthrough that is has to happen
via X@zhengyaojiang Very cool work! 💯✨
via X@tunguz Thats cool
via XAnd here we go - first *public* experimental evidence of RSI. As a side note, this post came on my timeline even though I don’t follow the author, so yes, the algorithm is still able to provide me with the content that I am interested in outside of my narrow circles of mutuals.
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
I love this work from @zhengyaojiang, @DhruvSrikanth, @yuxiangwu_, @BingchenZhao, and the @WecoAI team. It cogently paints the path to RSI. Now the track is marked, may the race to ignition and beyond begin.
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
Awesome work by @WecoAI in the pursuit of RSI. Proof the small companies innovating with taste and determination can move fast, and move well!
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
Exciting agent harness recursive self-improvement result. Congrats @zhengyaojiang, @yuxiang and @WecoAI team!
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
jensen huang rn:
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
some good self improvement research here
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
Positive users hail the AI agent's recursive self-improvement beating a two-year hand-tuned system as an impressive proof of concept, while negative users call the work unconvincing, wasteful, or insignificant.
Based on 14 visible X reactions from 98 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Awesome work by @WecoAI in the pursuit of RSI. Proof the small companies innovating with taste and determination can move fast, and move well!
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
Exciting agent harness recursive self-improvement result. Congrats @zhengyaojiang, @yuxiang and @WecoAI team!
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
jensen huang rn:
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)
some good self improvement research here
The first experimental evidence of recursive self-improvement (RSI). Autoresearching the autoresearch agent for eight days. The result beats the harness we hand-tuned for two years, on held-out benchmarks: 🧵(1/7)