@gleech Forgot to take the log
are you kidding me
Microsoft's Dimitris Papailiopoulos joked the essay omitted a logarithm
@gleech Forgot to take the log
are you kidding me
@gleech i think you're being too picky :p it's reasonable to say translation from perplexity/whatever to capabilities is exponential, and inputs to perplexity exponential, so scaling laws imply exponential gains, even if technically there's unstated translation step
are you kidding me
@DimitrisPapail oh wait I'm a dumdum; it does increase exponentially (ɢɪᴠᴇɴ ᴅᴏᴜʙʟʏ-ᴇxᴘᴏɴᴇɴᴛɪᴀʟ ɪɴᴘᴜᴛs)
@gleech Forgot to take the log
Given the target audience I'm sure it's mostly intended in the colloquial sense. Regardly I would not ever let this sentence out of my face into the world without saying "exponentially increasing computing power" too
@gleech i think you're being too picky :p it's reasonable to say translation from perplexity/whatever to capabilities is exponential, and inputs to perplexity exponential, so scaling laws imply exponential gains, even if technically there's unstated translation step
@gleech Eh, What are two forgotten logs among friends
@DimitrisPapail oh wait I'm a dumdum; it does increase exponentially (ɢɪᴠᴇɴ ᴅᴏᴜʙʟʏ-ᴇxᴘᴏɴᴇɴᴛɪᴀʟ ɪɴᴘᴜᴛs)
@gleech thanks i thought i was going insane
are you kidding me
Microsoft's Dimitris Papailiopoulos joked the essay omitted a logarithm
@gleech Forgot to take the log
are you kidding me