Users thanked researcher Chris Paxton for explaining how physical AI expands labor use beyond simple human replacement.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@sumirmeghani @instawork Thank you!
The fundamental premise of robotics is that we can automate large swathes of human manual labor and replace it with machine labor. In software engineering, abundance means more and better websites, easier data analysis, and more apps for niche applications. For robotics, universal automation — “free,” or really just radically discounted labor — means the “long tail” of jobs that just are not even worth automating right now. Clean streets, fitted clothes, fresh made meals and an end to disposable mass-produced goods.
What would be different if labor was free? Fundamentally thinking of robots as a replacement for humans is thinking too small https://itcanthink.substack.com/p/what-would-you-do-if-labor-was-free https://x.com/chris_j_paxton/status/2075236209711071326/photo/1
The fundamental premise of robotics is that we can automate large swathes of human manual labor and replace it with machine labor. In software engineering, abundance means more and better websites, easier data analysis, and more apps for niche applications. For robotics, universal automation — “free,” or really just radically discounted labor — means the “long tail” of jobs that just are not even worth automating right now. Clean streets, fitted clothes, fresh made meals and an end to disposable mass-produced goods.
Users thanked researcher Chris Paxton for explaining how physical AI expands labor use beyond simple human replacement.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.