Many users praise Terra 5.6 High for delivering a 40% speed boost in code reviews with solid cost-performance, while some report it as slower or worse than alternatives like SOL.
Based on 18 visible X reactions from 108 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@steipete @clawsweeper Yep for me Terra is doing all the heavy lifting. Terra is really good at Code review. in my pipeline Fabel been working as architect, Opus been writing code. And Terra been finding a lot of bugs and lolz Fabel is getting mad 馃槀馃槀. its keep complaining Terra is too strict.
@gdb The Terra tier seems to hit a sweet spot on cost-performance. 40% faster with negligible quality loss is hard to ignore for production workflows.
@steipete @clawsweeper 40% compared to SOL or just 5.5
@gdb Terra is awesome.
@gdb It's awesome 馃槑
5.6 Terra high is underrated. Switched @clawsweeper (GitHub review bot) to it and it's ~40% faster overall with negligible quality loss. Better than 5.5 on all counts. Massively cheaper. (Tried xhigh but that negates perf wins, didn't make a noticable difference in review evals)
don't sleep on terra!
Many users praise Terra 5.6 High for delivering a 40% speed boost in code reviews with solid cost-performance, while some report it as slower or worse than alternatives like SOL.
Based on 18 visible X reactions from 108 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.