Many users celebrate GPT-5.6 models outperforming physicians on health tasks at lower cost as meaningful progress for access and quality, while others dismiss the studies as rigged and attack OpenAI as scammers.
Based on 124 visible X reactions from 346 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@thekaransinghal Lower cost, higher quality, and broader access—this is the kind of AI progress that truly matters. 🌍👏
@thekaransinghal Congrats @thekaransinghal and @_khaledsaab!! 🚀
@thekaransinghal AI is trash money laundering no more no less
@sama This is amazing - very very very happy for humanity:)
The smallest variant, Luna, outperforms GPT-5.5 at 25x lower cost
@sama STFU SCAM ALTMAN
@sama 🖕thief
physicians found fewer flaws in GPT-5.6 responses than physician-written responses." https://twitter.com/thekaransinghal/status/2075689779937833302
I’m very proud of how small the gap is between our free and paid models at healthcare! https://twitter.com/thekaransinghal/status/2075689779937833302
@thekaransinghal Looks encouraging, Karan. Is there a preprint or a white paper to review with the methods and results?
Many users celebrate GPT-5.6 models outperforming physicians on health tasks at lower cost as meaningful progress for access and quality, while others dismiss the studies as rigged and attack OpenAI as scammers.
Based on 124 visible X reactions from 346 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@sama 🖕thief