Many users welcomed Meta's massive compute ramp for superintelligence because it boosts competition that benefits consumers, while others criticized Meta's data practices, monetization focus, and past failures.
Based on 22 visible X reactions from 31 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
They need data, and data collection is precisely Muse's focus. Meta dreams of a virtual world but doesn't do the heavy lifting there’s too much politics and not enough actual work. They won't attract users by pushing a data-collection model where the user just goes around in circles and pays for the privilege, to boot. Man, they even track their own employees' data it's pathetic. There’s no way I’m paying to help a company that couldn't care less about people and users.
@kimmonismus Agree. Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 are two great come backs and are changing the AI games between the "imcumbents" both from America and from China
@kimmonismus I love the pivot from open source to employee screen surveillance. Elite. At least BTC verifies itself without 3k rubric writers.
@kimmonismus The more competition in the AI space the better; in the end humanity as a whole benefits from it the most.
Meta expanded its compute infrastructure across a 2,000-kilometer footprint
@jason_haugh 100% this
@JordanNanos Thanks Jordan!
I do not think anyone saw this massive comeback from Meta coming. And now they are even receiving high praise from SemiAnalysis. Just to be clear: I have the utmost respect for SemiAnalysis and Dylan Patel. They do truly outstanding research. And if they believe that Meta genuinely has the potential to take on OpenAI and Anthropic because of its compute, talent, and data, we should take them at their word. What is more, Spark 1.1 has shown just how realistic that is. It seemingly came out of nowhere and surprised everyone. And that is good for all of us, provided it intensifies competition and forces Anthropic in particular to respond much more positively to its customer base. This is especially important because Meta and SpaceX are bringing cost effectiveness even more sharply into focus, while also putting pressure on OpenAI.
I’m missing something here How can “there is no data wall” be congruous with “screen recording top engineers will be a moat” Just yesterday current AIs destroyed the world’s best programmers in coding competitions The era of human generated coding data is ending man https://twitter.com/semianalysis_/status/2075298749660725591
Many users welcomed Meta's massive compute ramp for superintelligence because it boosts competition that benefits consumers, while others criticized Meta's data practices, monetization focus, and past failures.
Based on 22 visible X reactions from 31 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@JordanNanos Thanks Jordan!