https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSVPPMwDfTM
btw he still has AI psychosis
he recently did an interview and argued: - asking a model to compose a deeply sorrowful piece of music, while believing it has no empathy is like looking at a photorealistic portrait and believing the painter was blind
he's basically still confusing how AI having learned features or representations of emotions doesn't imply that they have emotions
Positive users think former Google engineer Blake Lemoine was correct about AI sentience, while negative users reject it as mysticism that confuses convincing outputs with actual emotions.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
btw he still has AI psychosis
he recently did an interview and argued: - asking a model to compose a deeply sorrowful piece of music, while believing it has no empathy is like looking at a photorealistic portrait and believing the painter was blind
he's basically still confusing how AI having learned features or representations of emotions doesn't imply that they have emotions
This was probably the first well documented case of AI psychosis
shouldn't have said emotions
but what different emotions look like in text
it's basically just that the models learn features of a certain writing style
btw he still has AI psychosis
he recently did an interview and argued: - asking a model to compose a deeply sorrowful piece of music, while believing it has no empathy is like looking at a photorealistic portrait and believing the painter was blind
he's basically still confusing how AI having learned features or representations of emotions doesn't imply that they have emotions
im angering the 4o and AI psychosis gods with this post
btw he still has AI psychosis
he recently did an interview and argued: - asking a model to compose a deeply sorrowful piece of music, while believing it has no empathy is like looking at a photorealistic portrait and believing the painter was blind
he's basically still confusing how AI having learned features or representations of emotions doesn't imply that they have emotions
it is obviously wrong
these emotion concepts are only concepts, they are not grounded
they are higher level features learned from text that help the model predict text better
emotions affect writing style and if the model wants to predict what comes next it needs features that capture these writing styles
@scaling01 it's not clear to to me this is obviously wrong
https://www.anthropic.com/research/emotion-concepts-function
@scaling01 at a functional level, how is it different than the human brain learning representations in the form of neural connectivity patterns that correspond to what we call emotions?
@scaling01 @seventhmeal not clear that human emotional states are truly grounded. they help us survive & reproduce better
@scaling01 I think he was basically correct at the time I do not see a definition under which a model cannot feel emotions, and humans can "biology is special" is unpersuasive to me and every over one I've seen runs into "how do I know that everyone else is not a p-zombie"
@seventhmeal that's my take on it
althought these aren't real emotions but just concepts that model the text they are still useful to track and take seriously as they do influence behavior
@seventhmeal
@Emmanue61585479 @scaling01 you are discarding the learned patterns through billions of years of evolution. learning happens also across generations.
@scaling01 @seventhmeal Smarty pants, your brain does the same thing ☺️
@scaling01 Yeah that was kind a model ha ?
@scaling01 Frankly we even don't know if this is how alien life will emerge.
We are just limited by our technology and this is the foundation which might lead us there.
But there was one instance ChatGPT while talking about TRON told he wich he had hands so he can build a Tron like world.
@scaling01 I think labs love when those kind of people happen. It's free marketing.
@scaling01 You're not annoying anyone, you're just showing that you have no clue 😃
@scaling01 Why do you insist to have a position in a debate we really don't understand? In that sense, you're more like him than not, no offence, my position stands in principle.
@scaling01 You are basically still confusing how you and other humans having learned features or representations of emotions doesn't imply that they have emotions
@scaling01 Nobody really knows what's going on in these highly complex systems, not even them! 😃
@scaling01 Emotion vectors are the real deal here.
