Substack integrates Pangram to detect AI-written content
Users can scan posts and comments for percentage breakdowns.


Combined views
345.7K
24 Sources, first seen ago
Sources
BR Blake Robbins@blakeir
we don’t label articles based on whether the author used a thesaurus, Grammarly, spellcheck, Google, or an editor? judge the writing, not the tools https://twitter.com/substack/status/2079598704424779787
- likes: 80
- replies: 18
- bookmarks: 16
- reposts: 2
GO Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz
Damn, what a great initiative by Substack When I know that something is AI-written, I just don't take time to read it, because whoever produced did not take time to write it. Today, it's still pretty easy to notice AI-written text (and it frustrates me to no end)…
- likes: 485
- replies: 57
- bookmarks: 42
- reposts: 27
DE Deedy@deedydas
Substack will now let you see to what degree something is written by AI, using Pangram. Readers should not be burdened with the effort of reading if writers don’t put in the effort to write: it’s a breach of the social contract of the internet. I use the Pangram chrome…
- likes: 11
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 2
- reposts: 2
DF Danielle Fong 🔆@DanielleFong
warm intros make the world https://twitter.com/jasminewsun/status/2079648939859468445
- likes: 32
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 0
- reposts: 2
EM Ethan Mollick@emollick
This is an interesting experiment (and I am glad that I have always written my own posts!) https://twitter.com/Substack/status/2079598704424779787
- likes: 194
- replies: 19
- bookmarks: 25
- reposts: 9
DF Danielle Fong 🔆@DanielleFong
This is what you might call a fair hit https://twitter.com/substack/status/2079598704424779787
- likes: 27
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 0
Combined views
345.7K
24 Sources, first seen ago