Sasha Gusev argues publishers must explain their human editing
Users support using LLMs to rephrase genuine content in better English because it is a simple and common practice that does not require special disclosure of added value.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
There are many downsides to the new reality that writing length/quality is no longer a useful indicator of effort. But one upside is that knowledgeable people who are slow/bad writers can now more effectively share their knowledge.
@SashaGusevPosts It's much more simple in most cases. People like myself are often using LLMs to rephrase their genuine content in better English. This is particularly valuable for people whose first language is not English. The idea that such work in not genuine because of AI is nonsense.
@sarthakgh @ByrneHobart The prompt is where the taste lives now.
Most AI content fails before the model ever starts writing.